The Rama Gita · Part 2: Knowledge Versus Karma

About 5 min read · 849 words

The Rama Gita · Part 2

Knowledge Versus Karma

Shlokas 9 to 16

Lakshmana had asked for the direct road to liberation. Here Rama fixes on a single point, that karma binds and knowledge frees, and at this very turn Vedanta breaks from Purva-Mimamsa.

If one line is worth keeping, it is this one.

अज्ञानमेवास्य हि मूलकारणं तद्धानमेवात्र विधौ विधीयते। विद्यैव तन्नाशविधौ पटीयसी न कर्म तज्जं सविरोधमीरितम् ॥9॥

Ignorance is the root of all of this, and the whole prescription here is its undoing. In that undoing the skill belongs to knowledge, and the action born from ignorance holds none, since action stands as its very opposite.

The Rama Gita, Part 2

Panel for rg/rg-panel-04-lamp-in-pot.jpg

Rama first points to the root that the whole bondage stands on. Ignorance is the source of it all, and every injunction of the shastra aims at erasing that ignorance. In that erasing the skill belongs to knowledge, and action holds none, because action is itself born from ignorance and sets itself against it. Rama says that if ignorance is not erased and attachment is not thinned, that same action turns faulty, and out of it the same round of birth and death returns, unchecked. This is why the wise should weigh knowledge alone.

Shlokas 9 · 10
अज्ञानमेवास्य हि मूलकारणं तद्धानमेवात्र विधौ विधीयते।
विद्यैव तन्नाशविधौ पटीयसी न कर्म तज्जं सविरोधमीरितम् ॥9॥
नाज्ञानहानिर्न च रागसंक्षयो भवेत्ततः कर्म सदोषमुद्भवेत्।
ततः पुनः संसृतिरप्यवारिता तस्माद्बुधो ज्ञानविचारवान्भवेत् ॥10॥

Now Rama sets out the objection that rises from the side of Purva-Mimamsa. Someone says the Veda has commanded action as well: just as it named knowledge a means to the human goal, so too it fixed a duty for the living being, and that action comes in as knowledge’s helper. The Shruti has called even the neglect of action a fault, so the seeker of liberation should always perform this action. But Rama answers that knowledge is independent, accomplishing its own settled work by itself, needing nothing from anyone, not even in thought.

Shlokas 11 · 12
ननु क्रिया वेदमुखेन चोदिता तथैव विद्या पुरुषार्थसाधनम्।
कर्तव्यता प्राणभृतः प्रचोदिता विद्यासहायत्वमुपैति सा पुनः ॥11॥
कर्माकृतौ दोषमपि श्रुतिर्जगौ तस्मात्सदा कार्यमिदं मुमुक्षुणा।
ननु स्वतन्त्रा ध्रुवकार्यकारिणी विद्य न किञ्चिन्मनसाप्यपेक्षते ॥12॥

Here Rama deepens the opponent’s argument, then cuts it down. Just as a yajna, a true act in itself, still calls for several other factors, so too someone says that knowledge gives liberation only when it joins with the works that ritual injunction has brought to light. But Rama says those who speak this way are merely debaters, and their claim is unreal, because it collides with plain experience. Action grows out of pride in the body, and knowledge is proven only when that ego dissolves. How could the two run together?

Shlokas 13 · 14
न सत्यकार्योऽपि हि यद्वदध्वरः प्रकाङ्क्षतेऽन्यानपि कारकादिकान्।
तथैव विद्या विधितः प्रकाशितैर्विशिष्यते कर्मभिरेव मुक्तये ॥13॥
केचिद्वदन्तीति वितर्कवादिनस्तदप्यसदृष्टविरोधकारणात्।
देहाभिमानादभिवर्धते क्रिया विद्या गताहङ्कृतितः प्रसिध्द्यति ॥14॥

At the end Rama gives the conclusion the whole part rests on. The movement of the self that is lit by the light of pure knowing is called the final movement, the last rung of all. Action rises with all its factors, and knowledge wipes out those very factors, every one. So the discerning person should give up work entirely, because knowledge stands opposed and there can be no combining of action and knowledge. Let such a seeker stay always intent on the search for the atman, past the reach of every movement of the senses.

Shlokas 15 · 16
विशुद्धविज्ञानविरोचनाञ्चिता विद्यात्मवृत्तिश्चरमेति भण्यते।
उदेति कर्माखिलकारकादिभिर्निहन्ति विद्याखिलकारकादिकम् ॥15॥
तस्मात्त्यजेत्कार्यमशेषतः सुधीर्विद्याविरोधान्न समुच्चयो भवेत्।
आत्मानुसन्धानपरायणः सदा निवृत्तसर्वेन्द्रियवृत्तिगोचरः ॥16॥
॥ Knowledge Versus Karma ॥

Going deeper into this part

Ignorance is the root: Rama’s whole argument turns on one axis, that the root cause of bondage is ignorance, and action, itself born from that root ignorance, cannot erase it. Fire is not put out with fire. In that undoing knowledge alone holds the skill.

Why action and knowledge do not combine: Here Purva-Mimamsa says that action and knowledge, walking side by side, grant liberation together. Rama cuts this down, because action grows from pride in the body and knowledge rises from the erasing of that same ego. One of them builds the doer, the other gathers the doer back in, and the two cannot stand together.

An echo of Shankara: This is the gist of Adi Shankaracharya’s commentary on the Brahma Sutra. Shankara taught exactly this, that moksha is never manufactured. It is only recognized. The Rama Gita was composed five centuries after Shankara, and it still echoes him.

Today, in Delhi: Take an engineer who has also become a seeker, someone who works the computer by day and sits in meditation by evening, holding both. This part touches him very directly, because experience has shown him that when knowledge finally reaches a person who has done real work in life, it has settled into the body and lives past anything the books alone could hold.

The difference in one line: Action is the play of ignorance, knowledge is its end. Liberation comes from knowledge alone, from none of the helpers offered alongside it.

हिन्दी